Apractical guide to evaluating student industrial placements

 

 

1)  A new emphasis on industrial placements

1.1 - A growing interest in combining standard education with hands-on experience

There is a clear trend throughout Europe to increase the importance of placements[1] within engineering education, where they exist (Germany, UK, Sweden, France), or to introduce them if they are not usual practice (Spain, Italy). This move is a recognition of a process where standard educational activities (i.e. lectures and practical works) alternate with hands-on experience. It corresponds to a widely expressed wish to set up a new balance between the acquisition of knowledge and actual experience. Such a development has its roots in the academic world, where studies are often seen as too theoretical, but also in the corporate world, where a new stress is put on competencies - or generic skills - which refer to an employee’s ability to perform a task in a specific context.

The importance given to hands-on experience varies with different countries

There are two philosophies of engineering education around the world

  • Engineering education mainly seen as an opportunity to get the necessary basic knowledge, and related know-how, the acquisition of practical skills being delayed to a training phase (UK) or to the first work experience (US).
  • Engineering education being built up as a coherent process, where graduates receive at the end a full title of engineer (Mainland Europe, France or Germany), which confers a recognised professional status.

 

2)  A movement towards international mobility

·          More and more international placements

A complementary trend, linked to the emergence of an international job market, is the development of industrial placements abroad. This move is in pace with the greater mobility of young students, who increasingly see a clear interest in gaining experience within foreign companies. Educational institutions have choice no other than to follow this trend.

3)  A growing importance given to assessment processes

3.1 - Assessment as a front-line management tool

Special attention is presently being paid to assessment, in practically all facets of human activity, wherever public (or complex) policies are involved (transport, health, education, etc.). Assessment procedures are supposed to give information on the efficiency of the process, as well as on the satisfaction of the users. Assessment practices appear as a front-line management tool, giving crucial information to correct what is going wrong.One has to keep in mind that assessment of complex processes involving people and social organizations is not as simple as physical measurement.

3.2 - The right way to meet users' expectations

In the present case, assessment should be understood as a part of the overall process of managing academic institutions and has to be run within a solid methodological framework. Evaluation appears in the educational context

3.3 - Evaluation remains a "risky business"

Everybody is able to express a personal judgment based even on partial knowledge, but this judgment will be difficult to exploit.

To obtain credible judgments one may, of course, rely on highly qualified experts. But in more informal cases one has to observe minimal methodological rules:

Evaluation has a strong link with quality policy: all efforts which are made for evaluation may be considered as elements of a quality policy, which is quite often built around an evaluation procedure

3.4 - The challenge of monitoring the process effectively

It appears that the planning and progress of an internship should be controlled and assessed, and that without this framework enabling actual supervision, the process may go off track in various ways (poor organization, transformation of an educational period into a simple job experience, etc.).

 

Students, firms and state authorities quite legitimately request

- transparency in practices

- feedback on the experience

- some elements to verify the efficiency of the process.

 

4)  A guide focused on three major concerns

This guide is at the crossroads of three main concerns for higher education institutions

  1. to develop links with the professional world and give students the best chances of success for their future career in a demanding and rapidly changing employment market
  2. to foster the international dimension in education in response to the mobility requirements of students and companies and to enrich academic institutions through exchanges with the outside world
  3. to carry out a quality policy through evaluation and assessment, in order to control, adapt and improve training processes to meet students’ and companies’ expectations.

 

 

How to use this guide ?

This guide does not intend to be prescriptive but rather to present a first set of guidelines, to outline methodologies and to record practical experience related to the implementation of student industrial placements in six European countries. In the following pages, the reader may find :

  • A source of information
    • A typology of placement practices and rules in six European countries
    • Addresses and reference documents on the subject
  • A source of advice
    • Specific guidelines for organising and managing international placements
    • A methodology on placement assessment with various systems of reference
    • Opinions from different companies
  • Benchmark material
    • A collection of case studies showing placement experience and best practices of managing, following-up, assessing and validating student industrial placements